Appellate Court of Illinois April 8, 2009, 1-08-1069 (Brookbank v. Olson)

JUSTICE COLEMAN,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

In Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas, 226 Ill. 2d 334 (2007), our supreme court overruled an interpretation of Rule 216 that imposed a signature requirement not created by the rule’s plain language and held that denials certified in accordance with section 1 — 109 of the Code of Civil Procedure are sufficient to satisfy the rule’s requirement