Court of Appeals of Maryland June 12, 2009, 110, 147, September Term, 2008 (Diggs and Ramsey v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 12-06-2009
MURPHY, J.,
Dissents.
Dissenting Opinion by MURPHY, J.
In my opinion, neither Mr. Diggs nor Mr. Ramsey is entitled to a new trial. From my review of the records, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that, “the judge’s egregious and repeated behavior reflecting partiality and bias during these trials denied Diggs and Ramsey their right to fair and impartial trials[.]”
State v.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit