Court of Appeals of Maryland June 12, 2009, 110, 147, September Term, 2008 (Diggs and Ramsey v. State)

Also known as

United States · · · 12-06-2009

MURPHY, J.,

Dissents.

Dissenting Opinion by MURPHY, J.

In my opinion, neither Mr. Diggs nor Mr. Ramsey is entitled to a new trial. From my review of the records, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that, “the judge’s egregious and repeated behavior reflecting partiality and bias during these trials denied Diggs and Ramsey their right to fair and impartial trials[.]”

State v.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.