Alaska Supreme Court July 10, 2009, S-12586 (Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Skin)

Also known as

United States · · · 10-07-2009

WINFREE, Justice,

with whom MATTHEWS, Justice, joins, dissenting in part. ' '

I respectfully disagree with the court's conclusion that Joseph Skin is entitled to medical-payments -(med-pay) coverage under his mother's policy. In my view this conclusion is inconsistent and incompatible with our *1104decision that Joseph Skin is not entitled to liability coverage under the policy.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.