Court of Appeals of Oregon November 17, 2010, 080342699; A138986 (State v. Nguyen)
Also known as
United States · · · 17-11-2010
*717
ORTEGA, J.
Defendant, who was convicted of two counts of violating a stalking protective order (SPO), ORS 163.750,
1
challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal. For the reasons explained below, we agree and reverse.
Because the jury found defendant guilty, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the state.
State v.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit