Court of Appeals of Washington May 24, 2010, No. 64975-2-I (State v. Van Atkins)

Cox, J.

¶1 Phillip Atkins appeals his judgment and sentence, claiming that the information and “to convict” *803instruction for his felony harassment charge were deficient because crime. Because “true threat” is not an essential element of this charge and the court’s instructions included an explanation of that term, we reject this claim.