Supreme Court of New Hampshire November 30, 2010, No. 2009-624 (State v. Spade)
Also known as
United States · · · 30-11-2010
DUGGAN, J.
dissenting. The plain meaning of RSA 642:9, II (2007) does not readily resolve whether merely causing a department of corrections employee to clean up a defendant’s bodily fluids is sufficient to satisfy the “contact” element of the statute.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit