Court of Appeals of Washington June 28, 2011, 29024-7-III (Lamar Outdoor Advertising v. Harwood)
Also known as
United States · · · 28-06-2011
*388
Korsmo, A.C.J.
¶1 Lamar Outdoor Advertising appeals the trial court’s decisions (1) to vacate a default judgment it obtained and (2) summarily dismissing its case. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the default judgment and correctly construed the rental contract at issue. The judgments are affirmed.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit