New York Court of Appeals October 20, 2011, 166 (People v. Santiago)

Also known as

United States · · · 20-10-2011

OPINION OF THE COURT

Pigott, J.

In this case, turning on the accuracy of eyewitnesses’ recognition of an assailant’s partially concealed face, we consider whether two additional eyewitness identifications sufficiently corroborated the victim’s identification of the defendant, so as to render expert testimony on eyewitness recognition memory unnecessary.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.