Missouri Court of Appeals August 30, 2011, ED 94766 (Glass v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 30-08-2011
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Raymond Glass (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his motion because (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to produce two alibi witnesses, (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a verdict director for stealing
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit