Missouri Court of Appeals November 1, 2011, WD 72986 (Newman v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 01-11-2011
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Michael Newman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Newman claims that the motion court clearly erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to cross examine the victim adequately. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit