Supreme Court of New Hampshire February 23, 2011, 2009-617 (State v. Farrington)
Also known as
United States · · · 23-02-2011
DUGGAN, J.
The defendant, Andrew Farrington, appeals his conviction by a jury on one count of prohibited uses of computer services.
See
RSA 649-B:4 (2007). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court
(Fitzgerald,
J.) erred by denying his motion to dismiss based upon sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.
The jury could have found the following facts.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit