Court of Appeals of Washington June 9, 2011, No. 28652-5-III (In re the Personal Restraint of Bailey)
Also known as
United States · · · 09-06-2011
Kulik, C. J.
¶1 We dismissed Gregory Bailey’s personal restraint petition (PRP). The State filed a cost bill under RAP 14.3 and RCW 10.73.160. Mr. Bailey objected to the cost bill. Noting that no published case has addressed whether the State may properly receive statutory attorney fees after dismissal of a PRP, the commissioner set the matter before this court.
¶2 A PRP is a civil action.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit