California Court of Appeal February 17, 2011, No. B222315 (Borger v. Department of Motor Vehicles)

Also known as

United States · · · 17-02-2011

Opinion

YEGAN, Acting P. J.

Here we hold that a defense expert’s conclusion that there is a margin of error inherent in a blood-alcohol level (BAC) scientifically measured with an “Intoxilyzer 5000,” an approved Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) breath testing device, may not be used to defeat the legislative determination that a person who drives with a reported blood-alcohol concentration

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.