California Court of Appeal November 28, 2011, No. C065982 (People v. Engstrom)
Also known as
United States · · · 28-11-2011
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
Where, as here, the jurors do not rely on extraneous materials or evidence, or conduct an improper experiment, is it misconduct for them to reject and correct what appeared to the jurors to be an expert’s formulaic miscalculation of the anticipated yield of an indoor marijuana garden?
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit