Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York March 22, 2011 (People v. Seabrooks)

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, a review of the totality of the circumstances (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 413 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38 [1977]) demonstrates that his written statement to the police, which was given after he was informed of, and *1131waived, his Miranda rights (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]), was voluntarily