Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York November 10, 2011 (Robinson v. New York City Housing Authority)
Also known as
United States · · · 10-11-2011
Plaintiff’s cross motion to amend his complaint and bill of particulars to assert a claim under Multiple Dwelling Law § 62 was untimely since the claim is based on a theory not previously advanced and the applicable statute of limitations has expired (see CPLR 203 [f]).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit