Massachusetts Appeals Court June 16, 2011, No. 10-P-1449 (City of Springfield v. Local Union No. 648)

Also known as

United States · · · 16-06-2011

Discussion. We first review the judge’s determination that the arbitration clause at issue does not fall within the category of “broad,” as it would if it applied to “any differences arising with respect to the interpretation of th[e] contract.” AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Wkrs. of Am., 475 U.S. 643, 650 (1986) (AT&T).

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.