Court of Appeals of Minnesota December 27, 2011, No. A10-2145 (Rew v. Bergstrom)

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant James Bergstrom challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate the 50-year extension of an order for protection (OFP) precluding him from contacting respondent Vanessa Rew or the two minor children of their marriage, arguing that (1) the OFP statute violates the First Amendment because it is a prior restraint on speech; (2) the OFP extension