Alaska Supreme Court October 28, 2011, S-13540 (O'CONNELL v. Will)

FABE, Justice,

with whom CHRISTEN, Justice, joins, dissenting.

I disagree with the court's conclusion that the contract between O'Connell and the Wills authorizes the award of post-judgment collec*48tion costs. In my view, the attorney's fee provision in the contract simply does not contemplate these expenses.