District Court of Appeal of Florida May 23, 2012, Nos. 3D12-117, 3D12-110 (Volcimus v. State)

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order denying his post-conviction relief motion. In his motion the defendant argued that he was not afforded effective assistance of trial counsel because his counsel did not adequately warn him of the immigration consequences of his plea, as required by Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S.—, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010).