Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York February 2, 2012 (Mulvaney v. DiNapoli)

Also known as

United States · · · 02-02-2012

Egan Jr., J.

Respondent is authorized to “resolve conflicts in the medical evidence and to credit one expert’s opinion over that of another, so long as the credited expert articulates a rational and fact-based opinion founded upon a physical examination and review of the pertinent medical records” (Matter of Freund v Hevesi, 34 AD3d 950, 950 [2006]).

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.