Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York October 9, 2012 (Hadda v. Lissner & Lissner LLP)

Also known as

United States · · · 09-10-2012

Defendants made out a prima facie showing that the three-*477year statutory limitations period (CPLR 214 [6]) expired before this legal malpractice action was commenced in July 2010. Plaintiffs failed to raise an issue of fact whether the doctrine of continuous representation applied here to toll the limitations period (see Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 94 [1982]; CLP Leasing Co.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.