Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York December 6, 2012 (Melo v. Grullon)

Defendant established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury resulting in either a “permanent consequential” or a “signifícant” limitation of use of his lumbar spine by submitting an affirmation by a neurologist who examined plaintiff and found a full range of motion of the *453lumbar spine, and diagnosed him with a resolved lumbar sprain/ strain (see Baez v Boyd, 90 AD3d 524