Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York December 13, 2012 (UBS Securities LLC v. Rae Systems Inc.)

Also known as

United States · · · 13-12-2012

Contrary to the finding of the IAS court, the clause at issue, which provides that defendant “may” in its “sole discretion” pay plaintiff a bonus based on an assessment of its performance, was not a conditional promise, but an entirely discretionary clause that imposed no obligation on defendant to pay (Hunter v Deutsche Bank AG, N.Y. Branch, 56 AD3d 274 [1st Dept 2008]).

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.