Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York December 19, 2012 (Hidalgo v. Cruiser Taxi Corp.)
Also known as
United States · · · 19-12-2012
That branch of the defendants’ renewed motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) and (4) to vacate so much of the judgment as was entered against the defendant Cruiser Taxi Corp. (hereinafter Cruiser) upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint should have been denied.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit