Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York December 19, 2012 (Cunha v. Urias)

Also known as

United States · · · 19-12-2012

By contesting the father’s contempt petition on the merits without objecting that it did not comply with the notice and warning requirements of Judiciary Law § 756, the mother waived any objections to the validity of the petition based upon those requirements (see Matter of Rappoport, 58 NY2d 725, 726 [1982]; Matter of Laland v Edmond, 13 AD3d 451 [2004]; Matter of Restivo v Cincu, 11 AD3d 621

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.