Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York December 6, 2012 (People v. Nehma)
Also known as
United States · · · 06-12-2012
Mercure, J.P.
Initially, we reject defendant’s argument that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Inasmuch as an acquittal would not have been unreasonable, we “must weigh [the] conflicting testimony, review any rational inferences that may be drawn from the evidence and evaluate the strength of such *1171conclusions” in light of the elements of the crime (People v Danielson, 9 NY3d
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit