Supreme Court of North Carolina June 14, 2012, No. 385A11 (State v. King)
Also known as
United States · · · 14-06-2012
lead-opinion
EDMUNDS, Justice.
In this case we consider whether the trial court abused its discretion when it granted defendant’s motion to suppress expert testimony regarding repressed memory.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit