Court of Appeals of Minnesota September 24, 2012, No. A12-0584 (Kastning v. State Farm Insurance Companies)

OPINION

HOOTEN, Judge.

Appellants challenge the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of their claim for uninsured motorist coverage under a policy issued by respondent, arguing that the farm tractor with which they collided was an uninsured “motor vehicle” within the meaning of their policy and, alternatively, that they are entitled to coverage under the reasonable-expectations doctrine.