Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit June 25, 2012, No. 12-6324 (United States v. Ismel)
Also known as
United States · · · 25-06-2012
*275Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Ismel appeals the district court’s order construing his pro se letter as a motion for reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying relief on the same. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit