Ohio Supreme Court July 3, 2012, 2011-0024 (Miller v. Miller)
Also known as
United States · · · 03-07-2012
O’Donnell, J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 56} I respectfully dissent.
{¶ 57} This case concerns whether a director of a closely held corporation who has fraudulently usurped a corporate opportunity for personal benefit in breach of a fiduciary duty may compel the corporation to advance expenses, including attorney fees, to defend a lawsuit brought to recover damages for that misconduct.
{¶ 58} Although R.C.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit