Nevada Supreme Court May 15, 2013, 58523 (Hall v. Hall)
Also known as
United States · · · 15-05-2013
did not abuse its discretion in awarding respondent attorney fees.' See
NRS 125.150(3); see also River° v. Rivero, 125 Nev. 410, 441, 216 P.3d 213,
234 (2009) (explaining that a district court must make specific findings of
fact regarding the evidence supporting the court's award of attorney fees
as a sanction). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
J.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit