District Court of Appeal of Florida December 20, 2013, No. 1D13-564 (Howard v. State)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, due to an apparent scrivener’s error, the written sentence is ambiguous as to the intended sentence structure. Given the oral pronouncement of concurrent twenty-year terms for the two counts of which Appellant was convicted, the court’s intent is clear from a review of the entire record.