Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 29, 2013 (Commonwealth v. Taylor)
Also known as
United States · · · 29-05-2013
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
In this capital case, appellant, Paul Gamboa Taylor, appeals from the order of the PCRA court dismissing his third PCRA petition as untimely and finding trial counsel1 did not have a conflict of interest during his representation of appellant. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit