Court of Appeals of Arkansas April 17, 2013, No. CA 12-598 (Rose v. Rose)
Also known as
United States · · · 17-04-2013
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. I primarily disagree with its decision to read four material rulings into the circuit court’s final order: (1) that Ruth and Woody Rose became de facto trustees before Woody’s death and while the trust was still revocable; (2) that Thomas Stone ceased being a trustee (at some unstated point in time); (3)
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit