Court of Appeals of Minnesota May 6, 2013, No. A12-1628 (Duncan v. Roy)
Also known as
United States · · · 06-05-2013
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.*
Appealing from the district court’s order denying that mandamus is an appropriate remedy for appellant’s dispute, appellant asserts his entitlement for this relief on his claim that the commissioner of corrections failed to formulate or administer “workable” supervision conditions that are “not impossible to satisfy.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit