District Court, E.D. Michigan November 12, 2013, Case No. 11-15135 (Shoemaker v. City of Howell)

OPINION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross Motions for Summary Judgment [dkts. 25, 26]. The Motions have been fully briefed. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED and Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

II. BACKGROUND

The City of Howell, Michigan (“the City”) enacted a version of City Ordinance § 622.