Nevada Supreme Court September 18, 2014, 64480 (Kille, Sr. (David) v. Cox)
Also known as
United States · · · 18-09-2014
their maximum term and not to the minimum term. Appellant asserted
that as applied to him, the 2007 amendments to NRS 209.4465 constitute
an ex post facto violation because he was convicted in 2003. Appellant's
claim was without merit. "[T]he ex post facto prohibition . forbids the
imposition of punishment more severe than the punishment assigned by
law when the act to be punished occurred.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit