Nevada Supreme Court October 16, 2014, 65483 (Shaw (Jeremiah) v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 16-10-2014
conscience, see Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991)
(plurality opinion); Blume, 112 Nev. at 475, 915 P.2d at 284.
Accordingly, we conclude that Shaw's sentence does not violate the
constitutional proscriptions against cruel and unusual punishment.
Second, Shaw claims that the district court abused its
discretion at sentencing by relying upon suspect evidence and improper
argument.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit