Nevada Supreme Court October 16, 2014, 65483 (Shaw (Jeremiah) v. State)

Also known as

United States · · · 16-10-2014

conscience, see Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991)

(plurality opinion); Blume, 112 Nev. at 475, 915 P.2d at 284.

Accordingly, we conclude that Shaw's sentence does not violate the

constitutional proscriptions against cruel and unusual punishment.

Second, Shaw claims that the district court abused its

discretion at sentencing by relying upon suspect evidence and improper

argument.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.