Court of Appeals of Washington June 12, 2014, No. 31156-2-III (State v. Browne)

Korsmo, J.

¶1 The trial court excluded Paul Browne’s medical marijuana defense because he had more plants than were permitted by the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). We conclude this was error under the facts of this case and remand the case for a new trial.

FACTS1

¶2 Mr. Browne was the designated medical marijuana provider for his son, Daniel DeHart-Browne. Mr.