District Court, S.D. New York December 22, 2014, No. 13-CV-5241 (CS) (United Veterans Memorial & Patriotic Ass'n v. City of New Rochelle)
Also known as
United States · · · 22-12-2014
OPINION & ORDER
SEIBEL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, filed on April 24, 2014. (Doc. .37.) For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED.
I. Background
A. Facts
For purposes of this Motion, the Court accepts as true the facts (but not the conclusions) alleged by Plaintiffs in the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), (Doc.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit