California Supreme Court May 29, 2014, S200923 (Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn.)

LIU, J.,

Concurring. — It is not difficult to understand why the trial court’s sampling plan in this case was “profoundly flawed.” (Maj. opn., ante, at p. 13.) The representative witness group was not selected at random but in a manner biased in plaintiffs’ favor.