Ohio Supreme Court March 20, 2014, 2007-0755 (State v. Maxwell)

Also known as

United States · · · 20-03-2014

French, J.,

concurring.

{¶ 288} I agree "with the concurring and dissenting opinion that the admission of the autopsy report and the admission of Dr. Felo’s testimony regarding the information contained in the autopsy report violated Maxwell’s confrontation rights, but that the admission of that evidence constituted harmless error. I also agree that Dr.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.