Ohio Supreme Court January 16, 2014, 2012-1782 (State v. McGlothan)

French, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 24} I agree with the majority to the extent that it rejects the court of appeals’ view that “cohabitation” necessarily requires proof that the victim and the offender shared living expenses, such as rent and utilities. As we made plain in State v. Williams, 79 Ohio St.3d 459, 683 N.E.