Supreme Court of Missouri August 19, 2014, SC93157 (Mark D. Vogl v. State of Missouri)

PAUL C. WILSON, Judge.

The majority opinion holds that, when the counsel appointed to represent an inmate pursuant to Rule 24.035(e) does not file an amended motion or a statement explaining why no amended motion is necessary, the inmate either can object to such “abandonment” in the motion court and/or assert that claim on appeal as the inmates did in Luleff v. State, 807 S.W.2d *242495 (Mo.