Army Court of Criminal Appeals April 18, 2014, ARMY 20120070 (United States v. Private E1 KEITH R. HAWKINS)

KRAUSS, Judge,

dissenting:

I agree that Brady disclosure requirements apply post-trial through the completion of direct appeal that ends with the Supreme Court. See Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 427 n. 25, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976); Fields v. Wharrie, 672 F.3d 505, 514-515 (7th Cir.2012); Leka v. Portuondo, 257 F.3d 89, 100 (2d Cir.2001); United States v. Behenna, 71 M.J.