Indiana Supreme Court June 22, 2015, No. 01S00-1312-DI-905 (In re Failure to Satisfy Costs in Lawyer Disciplinary Case of Weber)

PUBLISHED ORDER REINSTATING RESPONDENT TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW

On April 10, 2015, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a “Petition for Suspension of Attorney for Failure to Satisfy Costs Ordered in Connection with Certain Proceedings under Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23,” asserting that Respondent failed to pay costs assessed in a disciplinary action by the due date of