Court of Appeals of Oregon April 15, 2015, A155187 (Smith v. Psychiatric Security Review Bd.)

SERCOMBE, P. J.

In a proceeding pursuant to ORS 183.400(l),1 petitioner challenges the validity of an administrative rule adopted by respondent Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB). We write to address petitioner’s contention that OAR 859-050-0010, a rule that specifies certain information that PSRB must include in its prehearing written notice, is inconsistent with ORS 161.346 and ORS 183.