Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit April 14, 2015, No. 14-30958 (Zeising v. Shelton)

Also known as

United States · · · 14-04-2015

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed because an enforceable oral contract was not mutually agreed upon by these parties. The acquisition, purchase and terms, of the 29 Popeye’s restaurants, how they would be operated and what — if any — consideration and role Zeising would contribute, was left wide open.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.