Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit April 17, 2015, 13-10680 (United States v. Dylan Zara)

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part, and dissenting in part:

I agree with my colleagues for the most part, but I do not believe that the residency and loitering conditions are facially overbroad. First, as the residency condition is concerned, Zafa has not shown that the opportunity to live within “direct view” of distant schools or parks is a “substantial right.” See United States v.